Which citation correctly reflects mla guidelines for a website without an author? n. a. the land down under. australia department of tourism, 1 february 2013. net. 14 june 2013. n. a. the land down under. australia department of tourism, 1 february 2013. web. 14 june 2013. the land down under. australia department of tourism, 1 february 2013. net. 14 june 2013. the land down under. australia department of tourism, 1 february 2013. web. 14 june 2013.
Don’t include N.A. when there is no information for part of the citation with MLA. Also, it should say Web not Net.
The correct answer is “The Land Down Under. Australia Department of Tourism, 1 February 2013. Web. 14 June 2013”. You have to follow certain rules to fulfill a proper Moder Language Association, MLA, style. You must pay attention if the citation correctly reflects MLA guidelines without an author. Sometimes, websites do not state who wrote the information on the page. When no author is listed, you may omit the author information from the MLA citation for the website and begin, instead, with the title. The in-text citation for a website without an author is noted with the first word or words in the title in parentheses, followed by a period. Unless the website includes numbered paragraphs or sections, you should not include any additional information.
It is D. Hope this helps.
The correct answer is D. The Land Down Under. Australia Department of Tourism, 1 February 2013. Web. 14 June 2013. Explanation: According to the MLA guidelines for a website and almost any other source, when the author’s name is not known you should simply omit it. This means the first information you should include is not the author’s name or last name but the name of the website or source, which is the information after the author in most citations. Also, you should include the name of the publisher after the title of the source. According to this, the first information should be “The Land Down Under”. Besides this, the word “web” which is the medium should be included after the date of publication, and before the date you read the source. This makes the last option the correct citation.
The Land Down Under. Australia Department of Tourism, 1 February 2013. Web. 14 June 2013. According to the list of options, the last one is correct. When information is unavailable when creating a citation, just leave it out. If you put N.A. in its place the reader might think the author is listed as N.A. since some authors only use initials in their work (A.A. Milne…). The information is the title of the source followed by the publishing organization. Next is the date of creation followed by the access date. Please note: this question is out of date. The new MLA guidelines would cite this source now as: The Land Down Under. Australia Department of Tourism, 1 February 2013. Accessed 14 June 2013. The URL would be included after the date of creation. The word Web is no longer required.
Answer 6
hope this helps
- Old MSN groups - December 26, 2024
- Ashford Regal Review - December 26, 2024
- what is a misc. debit.? - December 26, 2024