Delivering single shocks in succession to stimulate the frog heart .

Delivering single shocks in succession to stimulate the frog coronary heart . a. elevated the peak of the ventricular systole wave b. resulted in fused tetanus c. resulted in wave summation d. didn’t improve the peak of the ventricular systole wave

Reply 1

Possibility- DDelivering single shocks in succession to stimulate the frog coronary heart didn’t improve the peak of the ventricular systole wave

Reply 2

didn’t improve the peak of the ventricular systole wave Rationalization. Usually the center endure a systole and a diastole beat. A single shock could not stimulate the peak of the ventricular systole wave.

Reply 3

Query: Delivering single shocks in succession to stimulate the frog coronary heart . A) resulted in wave summation B) resulted in fused tetanus C) elevated the peak  of the ventricular systole wave D) didn’t improve the peak of the ventricular systole wave The right reply is D). The Shocks did not improve the peak of the ventricular systole wave.   Rationalization: The above is an experiment carried out on a frog. Not simply on the frog however on is ventricule. The experiment was carried out delivering electrical stimuli on the ventricles at totally different factors: 1. when it was pulsating and a pair of. when it was contracting or stress-free. In the course of the first a part of the of the contraction till almost most, simulation did not have any impact in any respect. This era is called the Refractory Interval.   Cheers!

Also Read :   ‘apo-repressor of trp operon is an inactive form of repressor.’ justify this statement. select one of the options below as your a.

Reply 4

The right reply is didn’t improve the peak of the ventricular systole wave. What this implies in easy phrases is that it did not improve blood stress to the veins and arteries. There is a factor known as systolic blood stress and on this case, it did not improve following the shocks.

Leave a Comment