Which of the following trends is indirectly proportional to effective nuclear charge. zeff?

Part A Which of the following trends is inversely proportional to effective nuclear charge, Zeff? View Available Hint(s) Atomic size lonization energy Electron affinity O All of the answers are correct. Submit component A Which for the after styles is inversely proportional to efficient atomic cost, Zeff? See obtainable Hint(s) Atomic dimensions lonization power Electron affinity O all the email address details are proper. Submit

nic suze is inversely propotional to Z eff. b teff boosts the destination b/w nucleous also to elect electrons increases, because that the orbitals shrink . This measurements of atom Alimie deel dimensions a i atom reduces. Alonie suze Zeff here is the solution alun energy sources are perhaps not inversely proportional to Instalad Ionization energy sources are straight propotional to Zeff. This might be ble as es boosts the destination blw to nuclious and elections increases. Consequently even more energy sources are necessary to get rid of the elections, this Lonization Penergy increasy Ionization power XZ eft hence 2 isn’t the solution. Election affinity could be the passion for electron of an alom. A Zen simpler for an atom to achieve elections hence its electuon afferity increases Election affinity & Zet hence 3 isn’t the solution off Sence just we is proper, can be perhaps not the clear answer as all are perhaps not corren. WWW ecome
Part A Which of the following trends is inversely proportional to effective nuclear charge, Zeff? View Available Hint(s) Atomic size lonization energy Electron affinity O All of the answers are correct. Submit

Leave a Comment