What is one way in which black argues against the majority opinion?

People Reviews

The answer is “He argues that class was in fact disrupted because of the students

.He argues that students are not “people” as defined in the Constitution. One
way in which Black argues against the majority opinion is that He
argues that students are not “people” as defined in the Constitution.

Answer 6

D Explanation: He argues that school is not a platform for free speech. Just took the test and got it wrong because of the guy above smh

He argues that school is not a platform for free speech. Apex:)

(D) He argues that school is not a platform for free speech

Answer 7

He argues that class was in fact disrepted because of the student. Apex.

The best answer from the options, for the question: What is one way in which Black argues against the majority opinion, would be, A: He argues that the court has not protected teachers´ and students´ rights for 50 years. Explanation: Justice Hugo L. Black was one of the Supreme Court members who decided to dissent against the majority decision that was made on the case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, in 1969. Although the final decision was to uphold the initial lawsuit against the Des Moines school district, for having suspended the 7 students who decided to go against the school´s order not to wear the black armbands in protest for the death of Americans in Vietnam, Justice Black decided to dissent the decision. The final vote was 7 against 2 dissenting Justices, one of which, was Black. Among the many reasons given by Justice Black for dissenting on the final decision was not only that he believed people did not have the right to say whatever they wanted, wherever and whenever they wanted it, as the First and Fourtheenth Amendment established, but he also believed that even if the majority were to go and accept something as true, or constitutional, like upholding that any person has the right to do whatever they want, because they are protected by these amendments, he believes that it is also within a School District´s rights to enforce regulations and orders that, under the State´s legislature, ensure the correct functioning of the school, and that it is not in the Court´s reach to breach that right, or interfere on the way that school districts, under a State´s legislature, govern and rule their pupils and their teachers. This is why the best answer from the options is A.

Also Read :   A five-paragraph essay question is one of the three types of response questions

A. He argues that the court has not protected the teachers and students rights for 50 Years. Explanation: The Blacks were battling for their rights that prove to be against the majority as until now their rights were being crushed by the brutality of laws that favored the whites and discriminated against the Asian-Americans. Thus, they argue the court that it failed to protect the rights of black students and teachers and deprived them of their basic interests for 50 long years. They had a long struggle to battle for their rights, despite their representation being so strong. The passage emphasizes this claim and interrogates the failure of court in providing equality and protection of their rights.

B. He argues that class was in fact disrupted because of the students. In the case Tinker v. Des Moines, one of the dissenting judges was Hugo Black. Justice Black argued that the First and Fourteenth Amendments did not allow government to censor the content of speech. However, this did not mean that people were able to engage in demonstrations in any way and at any time they pleased. He argued that the students had been disruptive, and therefore, should not have been allowed to continue with their protest.

Answer 6

D Explanation: He argues that school is not a platform for free speech. Just took the test and got it wrong because of the guy above smh

In Gwin Co. v. Henneford2o Black dissented from a majority opinion
holding invalid a Washington tax on gross receipts from the business of
marketing fruit shipped in interstate and foreign commerce. He asserted
that the statute imposed a general, non-discriminatory tax measured by
gross receipts upon all business operating in the state. He agreed with
the majority as to the possible dangers in waiting for Congress to act,
but he thought that the national legislature was the agency responsible
for remedying them when they arose.

The best answer from the options, for the question: What is one way in which Black argues against the majority opinion, would be, A: He argues that the court has not protected teachers´ and students´ rights for 50 years. Explanation: Justice Hugo L. Black was one of the Supreme Court members who decided to dissent against the majority decision that was made on the case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, in 1969. Although the final decision was to uphold the initial lawsuit against the Des Moines school district, for having suspended the 7 students who decided to go against the school´s order not to wear the black armbands in protest for the death of Americans in Vietnam, Justice Black decided to dissent the decision. The final vote was 7 against 2 dissenting Justices, one of which, was Black. Among the many reasons given by Justice Black for dissenting on the final decision was not only that he believed people did not have the right to say whatever they wanted, wherever and whenever they wanted it, as the First and Fourtheenth Amendment established, but he also believed that even if the majority were to go and accept something as true, or constitutional, like upholding that any person has the right to do whatever they want, because they are protected by these amendments, he believes that it is also within a School District´s rights to enforce regulations and orders that, under the State´s legislature, ensure the correct functioning of the school, and that it is not in the Court´s reach to breach that right, or interfere on the way that school districts, under a State´s legislature, govern and rule their pupils and their teachers. This is why the best answer from the options is A.

Also Read :   1.09 Unit Test Narrative Techniques and Structure Part 1

What our team says

What is one way in which black argues against the majority opinion?

In the majority opinion, the court held that the federal government could not use its authority under the commerce clause to regulate activity that takes place entirely within a single state. Black disagreed with this opinion and argued that the regulation of intrastate commerce is essential to the effective regulation of interstate commerce.

Background on the Case

In the case of Brown v. Board of Education, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that segregated public schools were unconstitutional. This decision was based on the “separate but equal” doctrine that had been established in an earlier case, Plessy v. Ferguson. In the majority opinion, Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote that segregation violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

However, Justice Hugo Black dissented from the majority opinion. In his dissent, Black argued that the “separate but equal” doctrine should still apply in this case. He pointed out that public schools were still segregated in many parts of the country, and he thought it would be better to leave the issue to the states to decide.

The Majority Opinion

In his 1857 essay “The Negro Question,” black abolitionist Frederick Douglass argued against the majority opinion that blacks were inferior to whites and deserved to be enslaved. He pointed to the hypocrisy of a nation founded on the principles of freedom and equality that allowed slavery to exist. He also argued that blacks were capable of the same intellectual and moral achievements as whites.

Also Read :   What conclusion can be drawn about juliet based on her reaction to her pending wedding?

Black’s Argument Against the Majority Opinion

In his dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson, Justice Black argued that the separate but equal doctrine sanctioned by the majority opinion was a sham. He pointed to the history of discrimination against blacks in the United States, noting that they had been denied the right to vote, to serve on juries, and to receive an education equal to that of whites. He also argued that the separate but equal doctrine would lead to further discrimination against blacks, as it had in the past.

Criticism of Black’s Argument

In his article “What is one way in which black argues against the majority opinion?”, Black criticizes the majority opinion for its failure to take into account the experiences of African Americans. He argues that the opinion fails to understand the racism that African Americans face on a daily basis.

Black’s argument has been criticized by some as being too narrowly focused on the experiences of African Americans. Critics argue that Black fails to consider the experiences of other minority groups, such as Latinos and Native Americans. They also argue that Black’s argument does not take into account the positive changes that have occurred in American society over the past few decades.

Conclusion

In conclusion, black argues against the majority opinion by stating that the government is not responsible for ensuring that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed. Instead, he believes that it is up to individuals to take advantage of the opportunities available to them. While this may be true in some cases, it is not always possible for people to do so. For example, if someone is born into a poor family or lives in a disadvantaged neighborhood, they may not have the same opportunities as someone who is born into a wealthy family or who lives in a more affluent area. In these cases, it is important for the government to provide assistance so that everyone has an equal chance to succeed.

Leave a Comment