We all know that agreeing with other people’s opinions is a way to show that we’re smart and informed. But is it really the best way to make decisions? In this article, we’re going to explore the concept of “groupthink” and see how it can sometimes lead us astray. By the end, you should have a better understanding of why it’s important to think for yourself and not just go along with the crowd.
People are selfish
There’s no getting around it: people are selfish.
We see it in the way that people prioritize their own interests over those of others, the way that they often act without thinking about the consequences of their actions, and the way that they take things for granted.
In fact, it’s safe to say that selfishness is one of the defining characteristics of humanity.
But is it really such a bad thing? After all, if we’re honest with ourselves, we have to admit that selfishness is what makes life interesting and exciting. It’s what makes us want to explore new things and seek out new experiences. It’s what leads us to take risks and try new things.
So why are so many people scared of being selfish?
Maybe it has something to do with the way society is structured. In today’s society, it’s often considered shameful or unappealing to be selfish. We’re taught to think of ourselves as responsible individuals who need to put others first at all times. This mindset can be really limiting and frustrating when it comes to our ability to be truly satisfied in life.
People are irrational
People are easy to manipulate
People are often swayed by the opinions of others and may not always think for themselves. When presented with three opinions that pretty much mean the same thing, it’s easy to be influenced and think that this is the ‘correct’ opinion. However, it’s important to think for yourself and come to your own conclusions, rather than just following what others say.
Absolutely! It’s perfectly fine to agree with any of these three opinions, and in fact, it’s likely that you will end up doing so. After all, they all represent a kind of “middle ground” position on the issue at hand.
What is the difference between these three opinions?
The three opinions are that 1) humans are flawed and need to be fixed, 2) humans are perfect and don’t need to be fixed, and 3) humans are flawed but can still be saved. They all mean the same thing: humans need to be fixed.